INDIAN PRESIDENT IN NEPAL VS.MAOIST PREMIER

Guwahati

5 May,2009

_________



PEACE DEAL IN NEPAL HAMPERED

WOULD PLA RESUME REVOLT ?

___________________________



The turmoil that triggered off following Maoist PM Prachanda's resignation last night in the wake of a constitutional crisis that happened between Nepalese PM that sacked a defiant army chief and Indian Medishi Mr. Yadav- the president of Nepal who acted on the dictate of government of India in defiance of the imperatives of the administrative primacy of PM, may lead to reversal of the peace process in Nepal.



Both India and communist China had fully utilized the traditional political space in Nepal. China is not far behind either.Pro- India PMs and cabinets had conventionally ruled Nepal till the PLA with 20,000 armed cadres revolted against the king and the Nepalese dispensation as a whole.As usual, Indian embassy in Nepal did overtime work to retain thte Medishi[ people of foreign origin] army chief who against the peace deal in nepal, openly resisted the incorporation of the PLA in the Nepalese mainstream- i.e. the Nepalese army.Red China wanted that the Medishi army chief who broke the peace deal should leave the job to his deputy, who is loyal to the Maoist government.PM Prachanda sacked the defiant army chief who refused to obey the PM.



Todays morning papers had presented the Indian case fully and distorted the Nepalese sovereign right to rule themselves to suit the need of the Indian embassy that does the proxy administration even in the new dispensation.The PLA had already lost 13,000 cadres in the revolution to protect their economic rights and freedom of the poor Nepalese and the peace deal included norms to incorporate the remaining 20,000 PLA cadres in the Nepalese army and Nepalese national mainstream,lest they should remain rebels forever. The Medishi prez. Yadav claims that he is the commander of the armed forces and hence the appointment or dismissal of the army chief would lie with him.



In the cabinet form of government that Nepal adopts, the prez is a luxury and the real centre of power is the PM, since no two centres of power can operate in conflicting positions in the same polity.Impossible.It happened once in India also when prez. Rajendra Prasad claimed same authority as Yadav does in Nepal now.

Attorney general of India resolved the impasse by educating prez.Rajendra Prasad that PM is the sole authority although the Indian president is the head of the defence forces;it is the PM of India who woul run the military, appoint and sack the army chief,not Prasad.General Cariappa once harboured the ambition to rule India by marginalising the PM Nehru who clipped his wings forever by dividing India into four separate commands; Cariappa learnt the lesson late and he was awarded the highest civil honour not so long ago.Nepal's PM- red or blue is the actual centre of power which the Indian prez of Nepal Yadav from the opposition party should not contest.
Indian prez. liked to inaugurate the innovated Somnath temple; Nehru opposed that a secular prez. should not explicitly do like that with any religious group and India was peaceful with such people in power,unlike the war veterans in the elections at the moment.Now, Talibans of all faiths ar prepared to shed the war of worlds.


Morning papers in India blame Prachanda for resignation and reviving the turmoil without giving a holistic thought of bringing peace in Nepal.UNIMIL does not interfere,but India interferes and hence the explicit and reciprocal Chinese interference.Unlike China, India is surrounded by all small states ablaze- Srilanka,BD,Paki and what not; India itself has 15 Naxal infested states,7 plus one insurgent states i.e. 23 burning states out of 28.Indian interference in Nepal could be restrained so as to reduce Chinese interventions in Nepal.

In order to save the Nepal peace process from further sliding down, the Nepalse themselves could take care of themselves; UNIML itself plays considerable restraint in the face turmoil and uncertainty.Rational restraint by itself is an active conduct of business between and among the nations.
__________________________________________________gu_____